Agents
Show where Agents affected a real decision in the project. Include the implementation, constraint, test or measurement that makes the skill verifiable.
Build a tool-using agent with permissions, traces, retries and explicit human approval points.
This brief is designed as portfolio evidence for a AI Engineer path. The goal is not to claim a hiring outcome; it is to make your implementation, judgment and tradeoffs easier to inspect.
Show where Agents affected a real decision in the project. Include the implementation, constraint, test or measurement that makes the skill verifiable.
Show where Tool use affected a real decision in the project. Include the implementation, constraint, test or measurement that makes the skill verifiable.
Show where Safety affected a real decision in the project. Include the implementation, constraint, test or measurement that makes the skill verifiable.
Show where Tracing affected a real decision in the project. Include the implementation, constraint, test or measurement that makes the skill verifiable.
Show where Evaluation affected a real decision in the project. Include the implementation, constraint, test or measurement that makes the skill verifiable.
Use this as a project sequence, not a rigid tutorial. Your stack can change; the evidence should still show what you built, why you built it that way and how you know it works.
Turn the brief into a small finishable system. Decide what the core AI Agent Operations Console must do, what you will deliberately leave out, and how you will show that it works.
Build a tool-using agent with permissions, traces, retries and explicit human approval points. Keep the first pass focused on the main user or system flow before adding stretch features.
Create agent demo and tool permission model. Document the decisions, failure states, tests, performance, security or operational tradeoffs that matter for this project.
Publish the strongest artifacts, including trace viewer, failure tests, eval suite. Make it easy for a reviewer to understand the problem, architecture, tradeoffs and what you personally implemented.
A strong project page should make it possible to understand the system without guessing what you personally built.
Agent demo
Tool permission model
Trace viewer
Failure tests
Eval suite
A concise README explaining the problem, architecture and tradeoffs
A working demo, API example or reproducible run path
Evidence of testing, monitoring, performance, accessibility or reliability where relevant
Use this as a starting structure, then replace it with your real implementation details, metrics and constraints. Do not claim outcomes you did not measure.
These prompts turn the project from a repository link into a technical conversation about judgment, tradeoffs and evidence.
Answer with details from your implementation. Prefer concrete constraints, measurements and alternatives over generic best practices.
Answer with details from your implementation. Prefer concrete constraints, measurements and alternatives over generic best practices.
Answer with details from your implementation. Prefer concrete constraints, measurements and alternatives over generic best practices.
Answer with details from your implementation. Prefer concrete constraints, measurements and alternatives over generic best practices.
Answer with details from your implementation. Prefer concrete constraints, measurements and alternatives over generic best practices.
Add it only if it strengthens the engineering story instead of delaying a finished, deployable core.
Add it only if it strengthens the engineering story instead of delaying a finished, deployable core.
Add it only if it strengthens the engineering story instead of delaying a finished, deployable core.
Choose another project only when it proves a different part of the role instead of repeating the same evidence.
Build retrieval-augmented generation with repeatable quality evaluation instead of stopping at chat.
Classify and route support tickets with confidence thresholds, human review and evaluation.
Extract structured fields from messy documents and evaluate correctness against labeled examples.